Thursday, March 5, 2009

Where Did Mark Get His Material?

For those who like to dig a little deeper in God's Word, here is a challenging question. We are studying the Gospel of Mark. Where did Mark get his material for writing the gospel? The dictation theory simply states that Mark (and every biblical writer) got his material straight from God in dictation fashion. God spoke it, Mark wrote it, and now we have it in our Bibles. Very few people hold to this view.

Now, keep in mind that what I'm about to blog to you in no way minimizes one's belief in the inspiration of Scriptures. I believe that every verse from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:20 is God-breathed, fully inspired. But God chose to use human beings, each with their own personality and background, to write the Bible.

Most New Testament scholars believe that Mark's gospel was the first one written and that Matthew and Luke borrowed from Mark. There are tons of evidence to support this view. But where did Mark get his material?

We don't know for sure. But there is evidence that Mark had a very close relationship with Peter. Who could have provided more first-hand information about Jesus' ministry than Peter? So, many believe that Mark got much of his material from his close friend Peter.

Interestingly, Mark introduces us to Simon (Peter) in the first chapter. He is the first disciple mentioned. In the whole gospel, he used the name Simon six times, Peter eighteen times, and Simon Peter once. Mark has more references to Peter in proportion to length than any other Gospel. This fact might show interest in Peter; but it doesn't provide evidence that Peter was his source of information. We will have to leave this issue unsettled.

By the way, did no one challenge me on my Revelation citation above? Just checking your Bible knowledge. The last verse of the Bible is Revelation 22:21 (not 22:20). And, yes, I believe verse 21 is inspired also.

"For our email subscribers, please visit Ken's full blog page at to view previous blogs and many other helpful links."

No comments: